John,
from the past years this has been my experience, always when I felt I wanted to get another or "better" Rolex (in my eyes!), I could sell one watch to fund the new buy. Generally I would not lose money, and that is really great about Rolex Vintages. However, it is a hobby that is at least as addictive as crack...LOL
Originally posted by jholbrook
As I OFTEN say, I should take up a much less financially destructive hobby....like crack!Originally posted by redsubmariner
John, yes this is a new acquisition. Got it a couple days ago. I wish the watch had papers though, and it doesn't. That would complete my feeling about having a watch the same age as myself.
But now that people here say to me that I am crazy to sell a watch the same age as I am, I will not sell it any more. I will keep it. Decision made. This is like an incurable illness, once you get started with vintage Rolex, you can't stop. It's a hobby that can bankrupt you...Help!
It certainly doesn't cost you anything to keep it....and if you spot one later on with the box and papers, you can always sell the first one to fund the other.![]()
Ergebnis 1 bis 12 von 12
Thema: Rolex Sub 5513 from 1967
Baum-Darstellung
-
26.01.2008, 05:15 #9ehemaliges mitgliedGast
RE: New acquisition
Ähnliche Themen
-
Rolex Sub 5513 von 1967
Von ehemaliges mitglied im Forum Rolex - Haupt-ForumAntworten: 28Letzter Beitrag: 26.01.2008, 00:52 -
Rolex 5513, 1967 mit allem
Von Burgemeester im Forum Rolex - Haupt-ForumAntworten: 14Letzter Beitrag: 14.10.2006, 12:01




Help!

Zitieren
Lesezeichen