Was für ein stümperhaftes "Sicherheitskonzept" offenbar dieser Versicherung vorgelegt und akzeptiert wurde.
Wer glaubt seit Dresden 2019 hätte irgendwer dazugelernt, der träume weiter.
Ergebnis 561 bis 579 von 579
Hybrid-Darstellung
-
19.07.2024, 08:58 #1salve! , der Jo
-
19.07.2024, 09:30 #2
- Registriert seit
- 27.08.2011
- Ort
- Düsseldorf
- Beiträge
- 20.615
Ich warte leider auch immernoch auf einen knapp 4 stelligen Betrag, da ich via Timeless Investment auch von dem Diebstahl betroffen bin. geht mir auch maximal aufn Keks diese endlose Arie. Aber die Versicherung ist leider wohl auch bekannt dafür, dass sie sehr ungern reguliert.
Viele Grüße, Florian!
-
19.07.2024, 13:15 #3
- Registriert seit
- 04.10.2017
- Beiträge
- 492
tjo me too still waiting
-
19.07.2024, 16:24 #4
Wird das jetzt auch ein Wartezeitenthread?
-
27.08.2024, 11:24 #5
- Registriert seit
- 04.10.2017
- Beiträge
- 492
Hallo zusammen,
das Strafverfahren ist ja beendet und alle Angeklagten bekamen Haftstrafen. Hat schon jemand nähere Informationen von Insolvenzverwalter bezüglich der Verhandlungen mit der Versicherung. Leider gibt es im Portal keinen neuen Informationsstand.
LG
Daniel
-
08.11.2024, 19:48 #6
- Registriert seit
- 05.03.2023
- Beiträge
- 2
This is the last communication with the administrator consult on September 24:
"Following my letter dated April 8, 2024, I would like to update you on the current status of the insolvency proceedings of Watchmaster ICP GmbH.
The lawsuit I filed with the Berlin Regional Court II for the payment of EUR 14,367,576.31 plus interest, regarding the burglary and theft of approximately 1,000 watches on November 19, 2022, was dismissed on February 22, 2024 (case no. 24 O 146/23) on the basis that it was unfounded due to lack of maturity. The Regional Court based its views, controversially in my opinion, on the fact that the insurance company wishes to wait for the outcome of the criminal and investigative proceedings related to the burglary.
The 6th Criminal Chamber of the Berlin Regional Court I has now imposed prison sentences on four defendants in connection with the theft of the watches in its judgment dated July 19, 2024 (case no. 506 KLs 15/23), including the managing director of the safe and locker facility operator. According to the information available to me, the location of the stolen watches could not be ascertained even during the investigation in the criminal proceedings. I note that I have not yet received the reasoning of the judgment or information as to whether and to what extent the judgment of the Criminal Chamber has become final.
Parallel to the aforementioned criminal proceedings, the Berlin Public Prosecutor's Office is continuing investigations against a managing director and an employee of Watchmaster ICP GmbH in respect of allegedly contradictory witness statements. At present, I have no new findings or developments to share with you as, according to the information available to me, the accused employee has not yet been questioned. For this reason, the duration and outcome of the investigations, as well as the implications they may have for the insurance coverage of Watchmaster ICP GmbH, are not currently foreseeable.
I am in continued communication with Mannheimer Versicherung AG and the managing directors of Watchmaster ICP GmbH to further advance the settlement of the claim. Given that the insurer has not yet made a final statement on the basis and extent of its liability and the investigative and criminal proceedings are ongoing, prompt payment to the creditors cannot be expected. I kindly ask for your continued patience and understanding that given the pending proceedings and despite all efforts, it is not within my power to secure compensation from the insurer at this stage. I will, however, keep you informed of all developments in this regard."
-
26.03.2025, 20:23 #7
- Registriert seit
- 05.03.2023
- Beiträge
- 2
This is the last communication with the administrator consult on March 2025:
"Further to my letter dated September 19, 2024, I would like to inform you below about the current state of the Watchmaster insolvency proceedings.
As I have previously informed you, in its judgment dated July 19, 2024 (case no. 506 KLs 15/23) the 6th Criminal Chamber of the Berlin Regional Court I imposed imprisonment sentences on four defendants in connection with the theft of the watches, including the managing director of the safe and locker facility operator. According to the information available to me, the location of the stolen watches could not be ascertained during the investigation in the criminal proceedings. Upon my request addressed to the Regional Court, I was informed that the proceedings were closed with a (partially final) judgment dated July 18, 2024.
The lawsuit I filed with the Berlin Regional Court II for the payment of EUR 14,367,576.31 plus interest, in respect of the burglary and theft of approximately 1,000 watches on November 19, 2022, was dismissed on February 22, 2024 (case no. 24 O 146/23) on the basis that it was unfounded due to lack of maturity. The Regional Court held that the Mannheimer Versicherung AG is allowed to wait for the progress of criminal and investigative proceedings in connection with the burglary and theft.
Currently, the ongoing investigations of the Berlin Public Prosecutor's office against a managing director and an employee of Watchmaster ICP GmbH on suspicion of attempted fraud against the Mannheimer Versicherung AG and an unsworn false statement before the Berlin I Regional Court have not yet been completed. This means that the claim against Mannheimer Versicherung AG for payment of the insurance benefit has still not matured. As a result, it is not possible to make any payment to the creditors at this time. I kindly request and thank you for your patience. As long as the proceedings remain pending, it is not possible for me, despite all efforts, to obtain compensation from the insurer. I have asked the Public Prosecutor's office for access the file in order to assess the status of the proceedings. The files are not yet available to me, but I will keep you informed of all progress and new findings."
-
24.12.2022, 17:23 #8
- Registriert seit
- 24.05.2021
- Ort
- Hamburg & Berlin
- Beiträge
- 593
Themenstarter
Macht wohl wenig Sinn:
Die beschränkte Haftung ist die gesetzlich festgelegte Reduzierung des Haftungsumfanges. Dies bedeutet, dass ein Gesellschafter mit beschränkter Haftung nicht vollständig für die Gesellschaft haftet, sondern nur bis zur Höhe seiner zu Anfang erbrachten Einlage (GmbH).
Ähnliche Themen
-
Erfahrung zum Uhrenverkauf über Watchmaster oder Chronext
Von jxkr im Forum Allgemein - Trust CheckAntworten: 13Letzter Beitrag: 26.02.2021, 14:45 -
Kennt jemand von euch diesen Händler : watchmaster ?
Von hallo123 im Forum Rolex - KaufberatungAntworten: 1Letzter Beitrag: 05.06.2016, 07:02 -
Erfahrungen Watchmaster ICP GmbH (Berlin)
Von bernd32 im Forum Allgemein - Trust CheckAntworten: 27Letzter Beitrag: 27.08.2015, 10:11 -
Strenesse insolvent
Von siebensieben im Forum Kleidung & AccessoiresAntworten: 14Letzter Beitrag: 21.04.2014, 15:30 -
HEROS insolvent
Von Maga im Forum Off TopicAntworten: 3Letzter Beitrag: 20.02.2006, 20:02
Lesezeichen