Seite 1 von 3 123 LetzteLetzte
Ergebnis 1 bis 20 von 41
  1. #1
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291

    REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>

    Greatings R-L-X!

    Click on the link below to read my comparative review of these two great rivals:

    http://rolexreferencepage.com/SDPO/sd%20vs%20po.html

    Comments and discussion are welcomed and encouraged!
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  2. #2
    Officially Certified legendary Double Hell Driver 2009 & 2010, DoT Winner 2017 Avatar von Dr. K
    Registriert seit
    06.06.2006
    Ort
    Irgendwo im Nirgendwo
    Beiträge
    6.404

    RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>

    Thanks!

    Interesting review!

    "WINNER: Sea-Dweller."

    Greetings,
    Marco.
    Gruß
    Marco.

    „Ich sah an alles Tun, das unter der Sonne geschieht,
    und siehe, es war alles eitel und Haschen nach Wind.“
    (Qohelet 1,14)

  3. #3
    ehemaliges mitglied
    Gast
    John, your conclusion, or oppinion is right:

    "From a less objective, and more personal standpoint - there's considerably more than two points between these two watches - the Planet Ocean just isn't for me, and I much prefer the Seamaster Professional from Omega. For me, the PO is just too darn big in the 45.5mm size, I don't like the flat black dial....."

    I'm a little disapointed by one of the PO pic's, I see some "marks" on the glas of the watch.

    Thanks for sharing!

    Gr,
    István

  4. #4
    Sea-Dweller
    Registriert seit
    06.08.2006
    Ort
    Planet Earth
    Beiträge
    938
    Thanks a LOT john....

    Kind regards,
    GJ

  5. #5
    Explorer
    Registriert seit
    12.06.2006
    Beiträge
    190

    RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>

    Hello John,

    Thanks a lot for the interesting review (again)! I have read it with great interest, and although I like Rolex a lot...I must say that I do not fully agree with your conclusion.

    I myself have both watches, and for me the Planet Ocean is the obvious winner, because of its innovating design and technique. The Sea-Dweller is IMHO like an old Mercedes from the fifties that has had no innovations at all. So it is not difficult for me to point out a winner. However, it remains a question of personal taste. You obviously do not like the PO, and prefer the SD.

    As it seems to me, both watches are equally good, but the thing that really matters is: does one like the one or the other and what preferences does one have.

    Many thanks for the great reviews, they are all in my favourites

    Regards,
    Hans
    Age doesn't matter, unless you're a cheese...

  6. #6
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter
    Original von Penzes
    John, your conclusion, or oppinion is right:

    "From a less objective, and more personal standpoint - there's considerably more than two points between these two watches - the Planet Ocean just isn't for me, and I much prefer the Seamaster Professional from Omega. For me, the PO is just too darn big in the 45.5mm size, I don't like the flat black dial....."

    I'm a little disapointed by one of the PO pic's, I see some "marks" on the glas of the watch.

    Thanks for sharing!

    Gr,
    István
    Istan - are you disapointed in my photograph or the watch?
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  7. #7
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter

    RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>

    Original von Jaeger
    Hello John,

    Thanks a lot for the interesting review (again)! I have read it with great interest, and although I like Rolex a lot...I must say that I do not fully agree with your conclusion.

    I myself have both watches, and for me the Planet Ocean is the obvious winner, because of its innovating design and technique. The Sea-Dweller is IMHO like an old Mercedes from the fifties that has had no innovations at all. So it is not difficult for me to point out a winner. However, it remains a question of personal taste. You obviously do not like the PO, and prefer the SD.

    As it seems to me, both watches are equally good, but the thing that really matters is: does one like the one or the other and what preferences does one have.

    Many thanks for the great reviews, they are all in my favourites

    Regards,
    Hans
    Hi Hans - I hope it came across that from an objective standpoint, both are great watches. But yes, personal opinions will vary greatly.
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  8. #8
    Explorer
    Registriert seit
    12.06.2006
    Beiträge
    190

    RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>

    Hello John,

    Yes it did!

    Thanks again,
    Hans
    Age doesn't matter, unless you're a cheese...

  9. #9
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter
    Original von Gerard
    Thanks a LOT john....

    Kind regards,
    GJ
    You are most welcome!
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  10. #10
    Double-Red Avatar von OrangeHand
    Registriert seit
    13.10.2005
    Beiträge
    8.580
    Thank´s alot for your great review. I really enjoy these kind of comparative watch reviews, in that they allow for structured analysis of the details & features which make said watches being great diving tools.

    I agree with your conclusion that the SD is a timeless classic, and after all the many years still one of the most beatifull diving watches on the market.
    Superlative Grüße, Frank

  11. #11
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter
    Original von OrangeHand
    Thank´s alot for your great review. I really enjoy these kind of comparative watch reviews, in that they allow for structured analysis of the details & features which make said watches being great diving tools.

    I agree with your conclusion that the SD is a timeless classic, and after all the many years still one of the most beatifull diving watches on the market.
    Thanks much for the kind words Frank!
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  12. #12
    Explorer
    Registriert seit
    28.12.2006
    Beiträge
    126
    Hi John,

    what a great review. Though wearing a PO (small size) I share your point of view. I like my PO very much, but case and movement of the SD are superb.

    I was able to compare cal. 2500 with cal. 3135 (of my DJ), and the winner is: Rolex.

    If you like to sell your PO or SD, the winner is: Rolex.

    Nevertheless I love my PO.

    Kind regards
    Gruß
    Reinhard

  13. #13
    Hi John,
    congratulation, your review is a very good comparison between both watches.
    For me (I have a GMT) it would be very difficult to decide between this very outstanding watches. Both are very different and both are very unique. I think a PO with 42mm would definitely come close to the SD at the end. I wish all person who have to decide between PO/SD the money to buy both.

    I think all of us would like to read more reviews from you. Go ahead John :-)

    Best wishes
    __________________
    Gruss
    Jörg

  14. #14
    Mil-Sub Avatar von miboroco
    Registriert seit
    09.03.2005
    Beiträge
    14.854


    Danke!!!
    Gruß: Michael (Er kennt nur Beute keine Feinde)
    „Ich habe es schon oft versucht, aber erst einmal eine Fliege mit einem Dart erwischt. Die hatte aber auch Pech.
    Die saß auf meiner Dartscheibe im Wohnzimmer. Genau in der Triple-20.“
    Phil Taylor "The Power"

  15. #15
    Daytona Avatar von Hr.Nitsche
    Registriert seit
    03.07.2005
    Ort
    Hamburg
    Beiträge
    3.020
    Very nice watches, and great Pics. Thanks!
    Jörg

  16. #16
    PREMIUM MEMBER Avatar von David1973
    Registriert seit
    12.10.2005
    Ort
    Erdbeerland
    Beiträge
    4.998
    I also agree with your conclution

    The SD is "the" classic diving watch. No chance for any Omega.

    Thanks for your great review
    MfG
    David
    6,27ft=1,91m
    SUPERLATIVE "HELD"
    OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED



  17. #17
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter
    Original von jay_ti
    Hi John,
    congratulation, your review is a very good comparison between both watches.
    For me (I have a GMT) it would be very difficult to decide between this very outstanding watches. Both are very different and both are very unique. I think a PO with 42mm would definitely come close to the SD at the end. I wish all person who have to decide between PO/SD the money to buy both.

    I think all of us would like to read more reviews from you. Go ahead John :-)

    Best wishes
    You can find other reviews from me at www.rolexreferencepage.com and www.seamasterreferencepage.com.

    Thanks for the kind words!
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

  18. #18
    ehemaliges mitglied
    Gast
    John, I meant this picture. I think, there are little tracks on the glass. Nothing big, but they are the same, than my usual fingerprints on bracelets.



    Gr,
    István

  19. #19
    PREMIUM MEMBER Avatar von Edmundo
    Registriert seit
    19.02.2004
    Ort
    Schönste Stadt der Welt
    Beiträge
    37.971
    Thanks for the comparison of the watches. Now I know that I bought the correct watch.
    Grüße
    Elmar

    Plexi ist sexy
    Suche Omega 50th Anniversary Gold-Astronaut

  20. #20
    Yacht-Master
    Registriert seit
    03.03.2006
    Beiträge
    2.291
    Themenstarter
    Original von Penzes
    John, I meant this picture. I think, there are little tracks on the glass. Nothing big, but they are the same, than my usual fingerprints on bracelets.



    Gr,
    István
    Istan - perhaps you weren't able to read the entire review due to it being in English, but the photo is intentional. I was demonstrating the problems of having an anti-reflective coating on the outside of the crystal.
    John B. Holbrook, II
    OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page

Ähnliche Themen

  1. Vergleich: Rolex Seadweller vs. Omega Planet Ocean
    Von The German Stallion im Forum Rolex - Tech-Talk
    Antworten: 7
    Letzter Beitrag: 08.02.2007, 15:59
  2. Omega Planet Ocean....
    Von Unruh im Forum Omega
    Antworten: 159
    Letzter Beitrag: 19.08.2005, 23:26
  3. Ganggenauigkeit Omega Planet Ocean
    Von pauki im Forum Omega
    Antworten: 6
    Letzter Beitrag: 27.06.2005, 21:53

Lesezeichen

Lesezeichen

Berechtigungen

  • Neue Themen erstellen: Nein
  • Themen beantworten: Nein
  • Anhänge hochladen: Nein
  • Beiträge bearbeiten: Nein
  •