Thanks!
Interesting review!
"WINNER: Sea-Dweller."
Greetings,
Marco.
Ergebnis 1 bis 20 von 41
-
03.02.2007, 22:13 #1
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>
Greatings R-L-X!
Click on the link below to read my comparative review of these two great rivals:
http://rolexreferencepage.com/SDPO/sd%20vs%20po.html
Comments and discussion are welcomed and encouraged!John B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
03.02.2007, 22:24 #2
- Registriert seit
- 06.06.2006
- Ort
- Irgendwo im Nirgendwo
- Beiträge
- 6.404
RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>
Gruß
Marco.
„Ich sah an alles Tun, das unter der Sonne geschieht,
und siehe, es war alles eitel und Haschen nach Wind.“
(Qohelet 1,14)
-
03.02.2007, 22:27 #3ehemaliges mitgliedGast
John, your conclusion, or oppinion is right:
"From a less objective, and more personal standpoint - there's considerably more than two points between these two watches - the Planet Ocean just isn't for me, and I much prefer the Seamaster Professional from Omega. For me, the PO is just too darn big in the 45.5mm size, I don't like the flat black dial....."
I'm a little disapointed by one of the PO pic's, I see some "marks" on the glas of the watch.
Thanks for sharing!
Gr,
István
-
03.02.2007, 22:28 #4
- Registriert seit
- 06.08.2006
- Ort
- Planet Earth
- Beiträge
- 938
Thanks a LOT john....
Kind regards,
GJ
-
03.02.2007, 22:56 #5
- Registriert seit
- 12.06.2006
- Beiträge
- 190
RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>
Hello John,
Thanks a lot for the interesting review (again)! I have read it with great interest, and although I like Rolex a lot...I must say that I do not fully agree with your conclusion.
I myself have both watches, and for me the Planet Ocean is the obvious winner, because of its innovating design and technique. The Sea-Dweller is IMHO like an old Mercedes from the fifties that has had no innovations at all. So it is not difficult for me to point out a winner. However, it remains a question of personal taste. You obviously do not like the PO, and prefer the SD.
As it seems to me, both watches are equally good, but the thing that really matters is: does one like the one or the other and what preferences does one have.
Many thanks for the great reviews, they are all in my favourites
Regards,
HansAge doesn't matter, unless you're a cheese...
-
03.02.2007, 22:58 #6
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterOriginal von Penzes
John, your conclusion, or oppinion is right:
"From a less objective, and more personal standpoint - there's considerably more than two points between these two watches - the Planet Ocean just isn't for me, and I much prefer the Seamaster Professional from Omega. For me, the PO is just too darn big in the 45.5mm size, I don't like the flat black dial....."
I'm a little disapointed by one of the PO pic's, I see some "marks" on the glas of the watch.
Thanks for sharing!
Gr,
IstvánJohn B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
03.02.2007, 23:00 #7
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterRE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>
Original von Jaeger
Hello John,
Thanks a lot for the interesting review (again)! I have read it with great interest, and although I like Rolex a lot...I must say that I do not fully agree with your conclusion.
I myself have both watches, and for me the Planet Ocean is the obvious winner, because of its innovating design and technique. The Sea-Dweller is IMHO like an old Mercedes from the fifties that has had no innovations at all. So it is not difficult for me to point out a winner. However, it remains a question of personal taste. You obviously do not like the PO, and prefer the SD.
As it seems to me, both watches are equally good, but the thing that really matters is: does one like the one or the other and what preferences does one have.
Many thanks for the great reviews, they are all in my favourites
Regards,
HansJohn B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
03.02.2007, 23:02 #8
- Registriert seit
- 12.06.2006
- Beiträge
- 190
RE: REVIEW: The Rolex Sea-Dweller vs. The Omega Planet Ocean>>>>
Hello John,
Yes it did!
Thanks again,
HansAge doesn't matter, unless you're a cheese...
-
03.02.2007, 23:04 #9
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterOriginal von Gerard
Thanks a LOT john....
Kind regards,
GJJohn B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
03.02.2007, 23:56 #10
Thank´s alot for your great review. I really enjoy these kind of comparative watch reviews, in that they allow for structured analysis of the details & features which make said watches being great diving tools.
I agree with your conclusion that the SD is a timeless classic, and after all the many years still one of the most beatifull diving watches on the market.Superlative Grüße, Frank
-
04.02.2007, 17:54 #11
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterOriginal von OrangeHand
Thank´s alot for your great review. I really enjoy these kind of comparative watch reviews, in that they allow for structured analysis of the details & features which make said watches being great diving tools.
I agree with your conclusion that the SD is a timeless classic, and after all the many years still one of the most beatifull diving watches on the market.John B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
04.02.2007, 18:39 #12
- Registriert seit
- 28.12.2006
- Beiträge
- 126
Hi John,
what a great review. Though wearing a PO (small size) I share your point of view. I like my PO very much, but case and movement of the SD are superb.
I was able to compare cal. 2500 with cal. 3135 (of my DJ), and the winner is: Rolex.
If you like to sell your PO or SD, the winner is: Rolex.
Nevertheless I love my PO.
Kind regardsGruß
Reinhard
-
04.02.2007, 19:37 #13
- Registriert seit
- 03.12.2006
- Beiträge
- 49
Hi John,
congratulation, your review is a very good comparison between both watches.
For me (I have a GMT) it would be very difficult to decide between this very outstanding watches. Both are very different and both are very unique. I think a PO with 42mm would definitely come close to the SD at the end. I wish all person who have to decide between PO/SD the money to buy both.
I think all of us would like to read more reviews from you. Go ahead John :-)
Best wishes__________________
Gruss
Jörg
-
04.02.2007, 19:42 #14
Danke!!!Gruß: Michael (Er kennt nur Beute keine Feinde)
„Ich habe es schon oft versucht, aber erst einmal eine Fliege mit einem Dart erwischt. Die hatte aber auch Pech.
Die saß auf meiner Dartscheibe im Wohnzimmer. Genau in der Triple-20.“
Phil Taylor "The Power"
-
04.02.2007, 19:48 #15
Very nice watches, and great Pics. Thanks!
Jörg
-
04.02.2007, 19:55 #16
I also agree with your conclution
The SD is "the" classic diving watch. No chance for any Omega.
Thanks for your great reviewMfG
David
6,27ft=1,91m
SUPERLATIVE "HELD"
OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED
-
04.02.2007, 21:12 #17
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterOriginal von jay_ti
Hi John,
congratulation, your review is a very good comparison between both watches.
For me (I have a GMT) it would be very difficult to decide between this very outstanding watches. Both are very different and both are very unique. I think a PO with 42mm would definitely come close to the SD at the end. I wish all person who have to decide between PO/SD the money to buy both.
I think all of us would like to read more reviews from you. Go ahead John :-)
Best wishes
Thanks for the kind words!John B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
-
04.02.2007, 22:53 #18ehemaliges mitgliedGast
-
04.02.2007, 22:56 #19
Thanks for the comparison of the watches. Now I know that I bought the correct watch.
-
05.02.2007, 04:05 #20
- Registriert seit
- 03.03.2006
- Beiträge
- 2.291
ThemenstarterIstan - perhaps you weren't able to read the entire review due to it being in English, but the photo is intentional. I was demonstrating the problems of having an anti-reflective coating on the outside of the crystal.
John B. Holbrook, II
OWNER - LUXURY TYME: The Rolex Reference Page
Ähnliche Themen
-
Vergleich: Rolex Seadweller vs. Omega Planet Ocean
Von The German Stallion im Forum Rolex - Tech-TalkAntworten: 7Letzter Beitrag: 08.02.2007, 15:59 -
Omega Planet Ocean....
Von Unruh im Forum OmegaAntworten: 159Letzter Beitrag: 19.08.2005, 23:26 -
Ganggenauigkeit Omega Planet Ocean
Von pauki im Forum OmegaAntworten: 6Letzter Beitrag: 27.06.2005, 21:53
Lesezeichen