Die Patek ist eindeutig schöner.
Ergebnis 21 bis 32 von 32
-
05.07.2006, 09:04 #21
the patek is a step above the rolex in this case. both are fine.
rolex for casual,cabrio and sports. patek for dinner and operamfg Christoph
-
05.07.2006, 19:18 #22Ciao
Andere lassen auch nur mit Wasser kochen.
-
05.07.2006, 19:31 #23Original von chris01
the patek is a step above the rolex in this case. both are fine.
rolex for casual,cabrio and sports. patek for dinner and opera
But I would prefer the Rolex..."Der größte Erfolg des Zeitgeistes: Alle haben Uhren - niemand hat Zeit!" - Ernst Ferstl
Greets Marc
-
05.07.2006, 19:34 #24
Bei dem hässlichen Blatt der Rolex würde ich ich auch die Patek nehmen.
Gruß aus dem Sauerland!!
-
05.07.2006, 23:19 #25
Klasse Uhren , recht finde ich doch etwas bessér!
Ein richtiger Lude, das weiß jeder Anfänger im Gewerbe, trägt seinen Notgroschen am Handgelenk: eine Armbanduhr der Marke Rolex
(Der Spiegel 02.05.1983)
Beste Grüße Manuel
-
06.07.2006, 00:07 #26
Though this is a Rolex Board - I think it is an easy choice. The Patek!
Nice pic by the waylg Michael
-
06.07.2006, 13:30 #27
schwere Frage ....
aber die PP in GG ist nicht mein Ding ..Ich bin immer für Sie da
Markus
"Ein Auto ist erst dann schnell genug, wenn man morgens davor steht und Angst hat es aufzuschließen" Walter Röhrl
-
06.07.2006, 14:19 #28
-
06.07.2006, 14:24 #29
The Patek, John, but not the 1968
Viele Grüße, Manuel
-
06.07.2006, 14:32 #30
I have an observation after years of "watching", and I mean this only in a good way. The "best" watch is the watch that suits your own individual needs. Period.
It has nothing to do with price, features or any of the endless technobable spewed around on all sort of sites and forums. I've watched with great amusement how people literally anguish over what watch is "the best watch". They literally spend weeks, sometimes months, wavering back and forth. They hone in on a final choice, only to read a post or two slamming that choice or praising something else, and then the person is right back where he/she started agonizing all over again!
My advice is to simply choose a decently reviewed watch that fits you well, rather than languishing around all these web sites and forums getting caught up in everyone else's "mania" over having to get "the best watch". Don't get me wrong, these sites/forums are a great source of basic information indeed. I refer to and use them myself. However, it's sad to see so many anguishing for days, weeks and months over what to get!
The joy of a nice watch is in wearing the one which you yourself prefer and which fits you well, ... not in the selection of any theoretical "best watch". So the best thing to do is to grab the watch one personally prefers . . . and to return to the joy of wearing a nice timepiece !!!
... of course as long as said timepiece is a Rolex...Superlative Grüße, Frank
"Cool sh*t ain't cheap, and cheap sh*t ain't cool."
-
06.07.2006, 14:41 #31
It's never been this easy. Although it's not my favourite Patek, it still easily wins over the Rolex
Beste Grüße, Tobias
Orange Banane Apfel
-
06.07.2006, 15:52 #32
- Registriert seit
- 30.06.2006
- Beiträge
- 73
nix da R O L E X nehmen ist doch klar !!!!!!
oder sind wir hier in nem P P forum???
gruss ( und nehms nicht zu ernst..... sind beide schoen... )
Ähnliche Themen
-
Why is it so difficult to>>>>>>>
Von Jocke im Forum Rolex - Haupt-ForumAntworten: 15Letzter Beitrag: 20.10.2010, 20:28 -
Why is it so difficult to get a sharp pic?
Von Jocke im Forum Rolex - Haupt-ForumAntworten: 5Letzter Beitrag: 12.06.2005, 21:56
Lesezeichen