Hi,
Does anyone have pictures in the direct comparison between the fat lady and a normal GMT?
Regards
Andy
Druckbare Version
Hi,
Does anyone have pictures in the direct comparison between the fat lady and a normal GMT?
Regards
Andy
I have only 16760 vs 16750
http://pics.r-l-x.de/picserv/files/3...0_760_9524.jpg
http://pics.r-l-x.de/picserv/files/3...0_760_9537.jpg
http://www.marken-jaeger.de/dicke.jpg
Height:
- GMT Master (16750) Plexi - 1,30 cm
- GMT Master II (16760) - 1,28 cm
- GMT Master (16700) - 1,18 cm
For reference:
- GMT Master II (16710) - 1,20 cm
- GMT Master (1675) Plexi - 1,30 cm
- GMT Master (1675 thin case) Plexi - 1,27 cm
- GMT Master (6542) Plexi - 1,27 cm
- Submariner Date (16610) - 1,28 cm
Perfect Georg :gut:
cool, thank you very much.
I'm not sure at the moment, if I shall buy a 16700 or a 16760.
The 16700 have paapers and is in a better condition than the 16760.
The price is the same.
16700 vs 16760 are quite different GMTs
1) 16700 ist the thinnest GMT ever build - 16760 (Fat Lady) is the thickest. It a matte of taste
2) The handling of 24hour hand ist completely different on both watches
3) The handling of the date wheel ist also different.
4) For further recommendations we should have some infos about dial, hands, seriannr.
thanks 4 the gerat info
nice pics