PDA

Archiv verlassen und diese Seite im Standarddesign anzeigen : REVIEW: The Rolex Submariner 116613>>>>>



jholbrook
20.12.2009, 13:48
Greetings Rolex Fans!

I wanted to let my friends on R-L-X know that I've completed my review of the new two-tone Rolex Submariner 116619 - click here to read the review on THE ROLEX REFERENCE PAGE. (http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/116613/116613review.html)

As always, reply to this message with any questions or comments.

Milgauss
21.12.2009, 01:13
Fantastic watch report with - of course - great pictures :gut: :gut:
Thank you, John :dr:

DS-XELOR
21.12.2009, 08:11
Original von Milgauss
Fantastic watch report with - of course - great pictures :gut: :gut:
Thank you, John :dr:

And very informative :gut:.

makra
21.12.2009, 10:58
:gut:


Tks for sharing! :dr:

RBLU
21.12.2009, 11:47
Good review!

Here are some comments:

I would mention that the “glidelock” clasp is not identical to the one used in the DS and is lacking some of its functionality. Also, I would refer to the similarities to the GMTIIC.
Are there any technical reasons to prefer the Sub over the GMT?
Areas for improvement?

Regards,
B.

Dr.Nick
21.12.2009, 15:10
:gut:

jholbrook
21.12.2009, 15:48
Originally posted by RBLU
Good review!

Here are some comments:

I would mention that the “glidelock” clasp is not identical to the one used in the DS and is lacking some of its functionality.

Could you be more specific?



Also, I would refer to the similarities to the GMTIIC.
Are there any technical reasons to prefer the Sub over the GMT?
Regards,
B.

I didn't really compare the Sub to the GMT in my review. The Sub goes deeper, the GMT has a 4th hand - the main technical difference between the two.

Hannibal
22.12.2009, 15:54
Great report, i am looking forward to your comparison of the two watches.
Kind regards
Volker

Master GMT
29.12.2009, 01:51
:gut: