ARTICLE: The Evolution of the Modern Rolex Daytona>>>>

[jholbrook]

Greetings Rolex Fans!

I've just finished a new article and posted it to the Rolex Reference Page: http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/parachrom/parachrom.html

As always, reply to this post with any comments or questions.

-John

[wildpower2]

GREAT! Thank you!

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/9125/klassely2.gif (http://imageshack.us)

[Jason Spring]

Great !!
I love this watch.

[Martini]

Original von jholbrook
Greetings Rolex Fans!

I've just finished a new article and posted it to the Rolex Reference Page: http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/parachrom/parachrom.html

As always, reply to this post with any comments or questions.

-John

Well done John. There are also differences in the dial: the indices of minute 27 and 33 are long in the earlier versions and short in the later ones. Did this change happen together with the new hands?

[jholbrook]

Originally posted by Martini

Original von jholbrook
Greetings Rolex Fans!

I've just finished a new article and posted it to the Rolex Reference Page: http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/parachrom/parachrom.html

As always, reply to this post with any comments or questions.

-John

Well done John. There are also differences in the dial: the indices of minute 27 and 33 are long in the earlier versions and short in the later ones. Did this change happen together with the new hands?

Well what do you know! There are some differences in the minute markers - I guess I'll have to update the article! THANKS!

If you look at the dial comparison shots in this article of mine: http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/articles/6.html

You will will see the skinny and fat hands versions appear the same.

[jholbrook]

Guys - I've updated the article with new information, thanks to "Eagle Eyes" Martini! :tongue: :gut:

[Remco]

Great article, cool watch! :gut:

[newharry]

Thanks for that John - also answers my question in the other thread ;)