VIDEO REVIEW: The Rolex Datejust 16014

[jholbrook]

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a352/jholbrook/datejust1.jpg

Hey guys!

I've just posted a new video review (my first video watch review) on LuxuryTyme.com:

VIDEO REVIEW: The Rolex Datejust 16013 | Luxury Tyme: The Rolex Reference Page (http://luxurytyme.com/en/rolex-reviews/video-review-the-rolex-datejust-16013/)

Let me know your thoughts!

[xelor63]

Boring video.

XELOR

[ehemaliges mitglied]

The video is okay. The watch is great.

[jholbrook]

Boring video.

XELOR

What suggestions do you have for making a watch video not boring? Or do you not have anything helpful and positive to add?

[xelor63]

Using an other background, not 10 minutes of a moving second hand, more close ups.

XELOR

[Hannibal]

Hello John,
I prefer your reviews in written and photographed form. Video means that you present some "action" and "movement", but a watch is no suitable object for this purpose. Maybe a video makes sense if a watchmaker divides the watch in its parts. A change of the angle of view and some details of the watch will help to increase the diversity of the video. Also a title and music may be added.
Kind regards
Volker